Business

Major US law firms are largely silent on abortion decisions.

Major US law firms are largely silent on abortion decisions.
Written by admin

June 26 (Reuters) – The largest law firms in the United States have filed a lawsuit against Roe v. On Friday, Wade moved away from the approach of some large companies that made statements about the closely monitored abortion.

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 Dobbs decision upheld the Republican-backed Mississippi law, which bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Following the ruling, many states are expected to further restrict or ban abortions.

On Friday, Reuters asked more than 30 U.S. law firms, including 20 of the largest lawyers, to comment on Dobbs’ decision and whether employees seeking an abortion would pay for their travel expenses.

Sign up now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

The vast majority did not respond on Saturday afternoon, and only two, Ropes & Gray and Morrison & Foerster, said they would pursue such a travel policy.

Morrison & Foerster, which has about 1,000 attorneys, was the only major firm to make a public statement Saturday afternoon.

Larren Nashelsky, chairman of the firm, said Morrison & Foerster would “redouble our efforts to protect abortion and other reproductive rights.”

Dobbs’ decision has been pending since the draft law was leaked in May.

Several major U.S. corporations, including The Walt Disney Co. (DIS.N) and Meta Platforms (PURPOSE) He said workers who want to have an abortion on Friday will pay for their travel expenses. read more

Industry experts say law firms could talk about Dobbs in the future if employees and customers encourage them to take a public position. According to experts, for now, company executives are carefully considering the advantages and disadvantages of commenting, as well as the possibility of alienating customers.

“It’s a tight rope for firms to walk,” said Kent Zimmermann, a consultant at Zeughauser Group’s law firm. “They have different views among their talents and clients.”

Some companies have provided internal information to employees about the decision. Ropes & Gray chairman Julie Jones said in an internal memo reviewed by Reuters that the firm would hold several community meetings to discuss the ruling and offer “comfort.”

“As the leader of Ropes & Gray, I’m concerned about the impact of this decision on our society,” Jones wrote, acknowledging that his memory “could insult parts of our community.”

A Ropes & Gray spokesman told Reuters on Friday that workers included in the medical plan could receive financial assistance to travel abroad for abortion.

Another major U.S. law firm, Steptoe & Johnson, offered the U.S. workforce a day off on Friday, a spokesman confirmed. The spokesman did not immediately respond to additional requests for comment.

Despite the lack of disclosure, a number of law firms have openly stated before the decision that they plan to provide free legal support to women seeking abortions in the event of Roe’s overthrow.

Both New York Attorney General Leticia James and San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu, along with the San Francisco Bar Association, have collected pro bono initiatives relying on law firm volunteers. Participants include Paul Weiss, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher and O’Melveny & Myers.

In an internal message to Reuters on Friday, Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp called Dobbs’ decision a “crushing loss.” Respondents in the Dobbs case, Paul Weiss and O’Melveny of Jackson Women’s Health, postponed commenting on the decision to their advisors, the Center for Reproductive Rights.

The center said in a statement that “for the first time, the court has reached a new low level, taking away the constitutional freedom.”

Gibson Dunn did not respond to a request for comment.

Robert Kamins, a consultant with Vertex Advisors working with law firms, said firms would be “very careful” in taking the initial position on the decision.

“They have to make sure they think about it.” How does it affect business? What is the impact of the customer? What is the impact of recruitment? There is a lot to think about. “

Sign up now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Interview with Karen Sloan in Sacramento, California and Jacqueline Thomsen in Swampscott, Massachusetts; Additional report by Mike Scarcella in Silver Spring, Maryland; Edited by Rebecca Mintzer, Noeleen Walder and Leslie Adler

Our standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

About the author

admin

Leave a Comment